I used the schema as a guide that I won’t miss anything in the cover letter. Also, I didn’t develop the schema, thus, I need it as a guide but to find out what does it need as well. I think I used the genre in an appropriate way that I write the cover letter to apply a job that I found in NEU COOL. I feel like the schema has too many elements that I don’t know where I should put some common words like “and” to. Also, it feels hard to use some of the schema, there are some elements like and , sometimes it’s hard to make a sentence apart into those elements. However, these elements helped some time to get all the information in the cover letter. After reading the peer review, I feel like the definition of the cover letter is a little different from what I understand but it seems like making more sense to me. The cover letter is to describe things not from resume. Now I know more what I need for my cover letter. The understanding of the schema is the same between me and Tammy. Also, according to the peer review, I know that I will need to add something to show that I really want the job and my sincerity. Thus, I will need to think more about the genre.
I think the schema has been specific enough for a cover letter. I don’t think it needs any changes. I feel different to use this schema other than the schema from our group for project 2. I’m more an expert in the schema for feasibility report, but for this project, I need to do some research on the schema but still sometimes confused. I feel like it needs definition in the closing statement.
