I found the schema helpful as a template for the structure of my Writing Project 2 draft. Organizationally it provided a good overview of the sections commonly used to create a compelling proposal, and the definitions helped to further clarify these components. However, I think the schema would benefit from more structural flexibility. Having all content be required to fit into one of the predefined categories does not make it a very versatile tool. For example, a person might struggle to mark-up a proposal that was not composed using the schema as a guide, as all parts of the text may not conform to the options it offers. With changes to the hierarchical relationship between the <p> elements and the structural components, such as <feasibility> and <approach>, I believe the schema will be much better suited for general use and analysis, rather than just composition. Going forward, when making revisions to our schema it might be helpful to keep in mind all possible uses of the schema in order to make it the most useful tool it can be.
